Cryptococcal meningitis post-covid-19 infection: Immunomodulation, a double-edged sword.

Cryptococcal meningitis is an opportunistic infection associated with altered immunity. Immunomodulatory agent use in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may predispose such infections. Here, we present a 75-year-old male patient who presented with fever and altered general status after severe COVID-19 infection and developed cryptococcal meningitis. Opportunistic infection may arise from the use of immunomodulation in severe COVID-19, especially in the elderly population. This article describes the case and extensively reviews cryptococcal disease post-COVID-19 literature, highlighting the risk from immunosuppressive treatment.

Intravenous high dose vitamin C and selected antiviral drugs in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a descriptive cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: There is lack of universal agreement on the management of COVID-19. Intravenous high dose vitamin C (HDVC), remdesivir (RDV), and favipiravir (FPV) have been suggested as part of the treatment regimens and only RDV is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) so far. There is no study in Lebanon that addresses the descriptive cohort of HDVC and antiviral therapy amongst COVID-19 inpatients. Our goal was to highlight such a cohort. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective electronic chart review of COVID-19 inpatients was done over a period of 10 months (August 2020 to April 2021). Comparative data analysis was performed between HDVC and non-HDVC (NHDVC) groups, and RDV and FPV groups. RESULTS: Among HDVC patients, 70.1% (p = 0.035) and 67.2% (p = 0.008) had dyspnea and desaturation respectively. Patients on HDVC were less likely to remain in hospital for more than 20 days (p = 0.003). HDVC patients were more likely to be on oxygen therapy with 74.7% (p = 0.002). RDV patients were more likely to be on other COVID-19-related medications during hospitalization including the use of tofacitinib, baricitinib, tocilizumab, and anticoagulation as recommended in the guidelines. Statistical significance was noted for the status on discharge as 90.1% of the patients that received RDV were discharged after clinical improvement, compared to the 74.2% of the FPV patients. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to establish local guidelines for the treatment of COVID-19. A significant role of HDVC and FPV might resurface if randomized control trials are conducted.

The effect of the BNT162b2 vaccine on antinuclear antibody and antiphospholipid antibody levels.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) in December 2020. New adverse events have emerged since these vaccines have reached market. Although no clear association between messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines and autoimmunity has emerged, the significance of such an association warrants further exploration. After obtaining consent, a standardized survey on baseline characteristics and other relevant variables was conducted on unvaccinated individuals who were scheduled for vaccination and had not previously contracted COVID-19. Blood samples were collected from participants prior to the first dose, prior to the second dose, and 1 month after the second dose. All collected samples were tested for antinuclear antibody (ANA) titers using indirect immunofluorescence microscopy kits, and antiphospholipid (APS) immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels using an enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) technique. ANA titers were positive for 9 participants out of 101 (8.9%) in the first pre-vaccination draw. For the second draw, the number of participants testing positive for ANA decreased to 5 (5%). For the last draw, 6 (5.9%) participants tested positive for ANA titers. One participant tested positive for APS IgM at the first pre-vaccination draw, 2 tested positive at the second draw, and 2 at the third draw. As for APS IgG titers, all participants tested negative in the three draws. McNemar's test for two dependent categorical outcomes was conducted on all variables and did not show a statistical significance. The McNemar test of these two composite variables (i.e., ANA/APS, first draw vs. ANA/APS, second and third draws) did not show statistical significance. The 2-sided exact significance of the McNemar test was 1.0. The Friedman test also showed no significance (p = 0.459). No association was found between BNT162b2 vaccine administration and changes in APS and ANA titers. The benefits of the BNT162b2 vaccine significantly outweigh any possible risk of autoimmune dysregulation considering the current evidence.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody seroprevalence in Lebanon: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Objectives: The World Health Organization has promoted the use of serological testing as a rapid and accurate technique for the detection of immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In Lebanon, a better understanding of the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 is needed to develop effective measures for prevention and to plan an appropriate national vaccination program. This study aimed to measure the immunity status in Lebanon. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the population comprised male and female Lebanese and non-Lebanese residents of Lebanon between the ages 15 and 75. The exclusion criteria included: same household, symptomatic individuals, and extremes of age (< 15 and > 75). Representative testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (anti-SARS-CoV-2 electrochemiluminescence immunoassay/ECLIA) was used to assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Lebanon. Results: In total, 13 755 participants were recruited over a 6-month period. Of these, 3168 (23.03%) individuals tested positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2, with levels of positivity varying among districts. A higher level of seropositivity was detected in the female participants. Conclusion: Seroprevalence against SARS-CoV-2 varied within Lebanon, but was comparable to the levels reported in the MENA region at the time of the study. The seroprevalence documented in this study represents a level of immunity that is not protective at the national level. Funding: This study was funded by the Lebanese American University School of Medicine.